ARUMUGAM SERVAI versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B [2011] 5 S.C.R. 488 ARUMUGAM SERVAI v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU (Criminal Appeal No. 958 of 2011) APRIL 19, 2011 [MARKANDEY KAT JU AND GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.] Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - s.3(1)(x) - Complainants-PWs 1 and C 2 belonged to "Pallan,. caste, a Scheduled Caste in Tamil Nadu - Altercation between them and accused-appellant - Appellant insulted PW1 by calling him a "Pal/apayal" and thereafter the appellants caused injuries to both PW1 and PW2 - Conviction of appellants by courts below- Justification o of - Held: Justified - The word 'pal/an' no doubt denotes a specific caste, but it is also a word used in a derogatory sense to insult someone - Even calling a person a 'pal/an', if used with intent to insult a member of the Scheduled Caste, is, an offence uls.3(1 )(x) - To call a person as a 'pallapaya/' in E Tamilnadu is even more insulting, and hence is even more an offence - Similarly, in Tamilnadu there is a caste called 'parayan' but the word 'parayan' is also used in a derogatory sense - The word 'paraparayan' is even more derogatory - Uses of the words 'pal/an', 'pallapayal' 'parayan' or F 'paraparayan' with intent to insult is highly objectionable and also an offence under the SC/ST Act - It is just unacceptable in the modem age - The appellants behaved like uncivilized savages, and hence deserve no mercy. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes - Prevention G of atrocities - Two tumbler system prevalent in State of Tamil Nadu - Separate tumblers for serving tea or other drinks to Scheduled Caste persons and non-Scheduled Caste persons in tea shops and restaurants - Held: This is highly objectionable, and is an offence under the SC/ST Act, and H 488 ARUMUGAM SERVAI v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU 489 hence those practicing it must be criminally proceeded A against and given harsh punishment if found guilty. Honour Killings - 'Khap Panchayats' (known as Katta Panchayats in Tamt1 Nadu) - Institutionalized crime on boys and girls of different castes and religion, who wish to get B married or have been married, and interference with the personal lives of people - Held: This is wholly illegal and has to be ruthlessly stamped out - There is nothing honourable in honour killing or other atrocities and, in fact, it is nothing but barbaric and shameful murder - Hence, administrative C and police officials directed to take strong measures to prevent such atrocious acts. Ac.cording to the prosecution, there was an altercation between the appellants and complainants- PW1 and PW2 (who belonged to a Scheduled Caste in D the State of Tamil Nadu) whereafter appellant insulted PW1 by calling him a pallapayal and that he ate deadly cow beef and that then the accused-appellants attacked PW1 and PW2 causing them injuries. The appellants were convicted by the courts below under Section 3(1)(x) of the E Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Hence the present appeals. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. Both the Courts below believed the F prosecution case, and this Court sees no reason to differ. There is no reason to disbelieve the testimony of the witnesses. [Para 6) [494-D] 2.1. The accused belong to the 'servai' caste whic:;h G is a backward caste, whereas the complainants belong' to the 'pallan' caste which is a Scheduled Caste in Tamil Nadu. The word 'pallan' no doubt denotes a specific caste, but it is also a word used in a derogatory sense to insult someone (just as in North India the word 'chamar' H 490 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011) 5 S.C.R. A denotes a specific caste, but It is also used in a derogatory sense to insult someone). Even calling a person a 'pallan', if used with intent to insult a member of the Scheduled Caste, is, an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes B (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. To call a person as a 'pallapayal' in Tamilnadu is even more insulting, and hence is even more an offence. Similarly, in Tamilnadu there is a caste called 'parayan' but the word 'parayan' is also used in a derogatory sense.ยท The word c 'paraparayan' is even more derogatory. [Paras 7, 8 and 9] [494-E-H; 495-A] 2.2. Uses of the words 'pallan', 'pallapayal' 'parayan' or 'paraparayan' with intent to insult is highly objectionable and is also an offence under the SC/ST Act. D It is just unacceptable in the
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex