LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ARCHANA GIRISH SABNIS versus BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Citation: [2014] 14 S.C.R. 704 · Decided: 26-11-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.Y. EQBAL · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 7Q4 
ARCHANA GIRISH SABNIS 
v. 
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAAND OTHERS 
(Civil Appeal No.4232 of 2007) 
B 
NOVEMBER 26, 2014 
[M. Y. EQBALAND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.] 
Advocates - Enrolment as advocate - denial of- On 
the ground that the candidate was not eligible for enrolment 
C as her qualification in Homeopathy medicines i.e. Licentiate 
of the Court of Examiners (LCEH) was not recognized by Bar 
Council of India - Propriety of - Held: From s. 13 and 
Schedule of the Homeopathy Central Council Act and 
regulation 4 of Homeopathic Regulations, 1989, it is evident 
0 
that LCEH is not a bachelor degree- The candidate has not 
been able to show that LCEH is a degree or equivalent to 
degree verified by UGC with previous approval of Central 
Government - Bar Council of India is empowered to make 
rules ulss. 7 and 49 of Advocates Act and has independent 
E power to recognize any equivalent qualification to a graduate 
degree for the purpose of admission in course of graduate 
degree in law - Enrolment was rightly denied to her -
Advocates Act, 1961 - ss. 7 and 49 :-- Bar Council of India 
Rules - University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - s. 22(3) 
- Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973- s. 13 and Second 
F 
Schedule - Homeopathic (Postgraduate Degree Course) 
Regulations, 1989 - Regn. 4. 
Words and Phrases - 'Degree' - Meaning of, in the 
context of s. 22(3) of University Grants Commission Act, 
G 
1956, 
Dismissing the appeal, the Court 
HELD: 1. A perusal of the provisions of Section 13 
alongwith Second Schedule to Homeopathy Central 
Council Act, 1973, would show that me.dical 
H qualifications granted by any University, Board or other 
704 
AR CHANA GIRISH SABNIS v. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA 
705 
AND OTHERS 
institution which are included in the Schedule, shall be A 
recognized as medical qualifications for the purpose of 
the Act and not for any other purposes. The Second 
Schedule mentioned various degree courses and 
diploma courses and other qualifications which are 
granted by various homoeopathy medical colleges and B 
institutions. From perusal of the Schedule, it is evident 
that various States' homoeopathy colleges recognized 
degree course and diploma courses. From the Second 
Schedule it is evident that LCEH is not a bachelor degree 
but it is a qualification to practice in homeopathy C 
medicine. [Para 21][720-D-G] 
2. Perusal of Regulation 4 of Homeopathic 
(Postgraduate Degree Course) Regulations, 1989, makes 
it clear that for the purpose of admission to the 
M.D.(Hom.), the candidate must possess a degree in D 
Bachelor of Homoeopathic Medicine and Surgery 
(BHMS) or equivalent qualification in Homoeopathy 
included in the Second Schedule to the Act, after 
completing a course of study of not less than 5 years 
and 6 months duration including one year compulsory E 
internship. Admittedly, the appellant does not possess 
any degree in BHMS or equivalent qualification in as 
much as the LCEH qualification which the appellant 
possesses, is less than a 5 years' course without any 
compulsory internship. [Paras 23 and 24][721-D-G] 
F 
3. Sub-section 3 of Section 22 of University Grants 
Commission Act, 1956 defines the word 'degree' which 
means any such degree which is specified by the 
University Grants Commission in the official gazette with 
the approval of the Central Government. The appellant G 
has not produced any such notification to show that the 
qualification of LCEH is a ·degree or equivalent to a 
degree duly notified by the Commission with 
H 
706 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2014] 14 S.C.R. 
A the previous approval of the Central Government. 
[Para 26][722-C-E] 
4. The Bar Council of India Rules provide that for 
the purpose of joining the course in law for a degree, 
candidate must be a graduate of any University or must 
B possess such academic qualifications which are 
considered equivalent to a graduate degree of a 
University, recognized· by the. Bar Council of India. 
Section 7 and Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 
specifically empower the Bar Council of India to make 
C rules prescribin(I a minimum qualification required for 
admission for the course of degree in law from any 
recognized University. The Bar Council has the 
independent power to recognize any equivalent 
qualification to a graduate degree for the purpose of 
D admission in the course of graduate degree in law. 
[Paras 27 and 28][722-E-H] 
5. The Bar Council of India is not bound to grant a 
license as clai

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.