LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY REP. BY REGISTRAR versus SECY. TO GOVT. INFN. & TOURISM DEPT. & ORS.

Citation: [2009] 3 S.C.R. 355 · Decided: 25-02-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.B. SINHA · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 4 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

-
[2009] 3 S.C.R. 355 
โ€ข 
ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY REP. BY REGISTRAR 
A 
v. 
SECY. TO GOVT. INFN. & TOURISM DEPT. & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 4173 of 2008) 
FEBRUARY 25, 2009 
B 
ยท [S.B. SINHA AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.] 
University Grants Commission (the minimum standards 
of instructions for the grant of the first degree through non-
formal/distance education in the faculties of Arts, Humanities, c 
Fine Arts, Music, Social Sciences, Commerce and Sciences) 
Regulations, 1985: 
Regulation 2 - University awarding M.A. degree through 
" 
Open University System without the candidate having passed D 
Bachelor's degree course - HELD: The M.A. degree so 
awarded to the candidate being in violation of the Regulations, 
he was rightly held by High Court not eligible for appointment 
to the post of Principal of the Film and Television Institute -
Service Law. 
E 
The instant appeals were filed by the Annamalai 
University and a candidate whose appointment as 
Principal in the Film and Television Institute, Tamil Nadu, 
was challenged by the respondent-candidate in a writ 
petition before the High Court. The Division Bench of the F 
High Court held that the appellant was not eligible to be 
considered for the post, as the M.A. degree obtained by 
him through Open University System without there being 
a first (Bachelor's) degree was not a valid one and, 
consequently, directed the State to take steps to fill up G 
-" 
> 
the post in accordance with law. 
It was contended for the appellant-University that the 
University Grants Commission (the minimum standards 
355 
H 
356 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009] 3 S.C.R. 
A of instructions for the grant of the first degree through 
non-formal/distance education in the faculties of Arts, 
Humanities, Fine Arts, Music, Social Sciences, Commerce 
and Sciences) Regulations, 1985, framed by the UGC 
both providing for the eligibility to seek admission to the 
B Master's degree as also information required to be 
furnished thereabout by the State Universities to the UGC, 
the latter must be held to have relaxed the conditions as 
no direction in that behalf was communicated to the 
University. The contention on behalf of the appellant-
C candidate, was that the Master's degrees awarded upto 
30.6.1989 were treated to be valid and the UGC 
Regulations were amended only in the year 2003. F o r 
the respondents it was contended that the purported ex 
post facto recognition of the MA degree granted by the 
0 
Distance Education Council was wholly without 
jurisdiction. 
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 
HELD:1.1 In the matter of higher education, it is 
E necessary to maintain minimum standards of 
instructions. Such minimum standards of instructions are 
required to be defined by UGC. The standards and the 
coordination of work or facilities in universities must be 
maintained and for that purpose required to be regulated. 
F [Para 23] [381-E-F] 
1.2. In the matter of laying down qualification of 
teachers, running of the University and the matters 
provided for under the UGC Act, the 1985 Regulations are 
applicable and binding on all concerned. The 
G Regulations clearly aimed at the Open Universities. 
IGNOU has not made any regulation; nor has it issued 
any Ordinance; it is guided by the Regulations framed by 
the UGC. The validity of the provisions of the 1985 
Regulations has not been questioned either by IGNOU or 
H by the appellant-University. From a letter dated 5.5.2004 
-
'. 
ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY REP. BY REGISTRAR v. SECY. 
357 
.... 
TO GOVT. INFN. & TOURISM DEPT. & ORS . 
~ 
issued by the authority who was not only the Vice-
A 
Chancellor but also the Chairman of the Distance 
Education Council of IGNOU it is evident that the 
appellant-University has violated the mandatory 
provisions of the 1985 Regulations. [Para 23] [382-C-F] 
1.3. Indisputably, the fact that the appellant-
B 
University had been granting postgraduate degrees to 
~ 
the candidates concerned, although they had not 
completed three years' graduate degree course, in 
violation of Regulation 2 of the 1985 Regulations, came c 
to the notice of the UGC as also IGNOU. A meeting was 
held in March 2004. It was agreed in the said meeting that 
the admission to the Masters' Degree Programme under 
the OUS without requiring the three years graduate 
degree qualification be discontinued with effect from July, D 
2004. It, however, appears that the degrees obtained after 
1.3.1995 upto 20.6.2007 have been recognized by the

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.