LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ANIL KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

Citation: [2014] 6 S.C.R. 561 · Decided: 28-05-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.S. CHAUHAN · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2014] 6 S.C.R. 561 
ANIL KUMAR 
A 
.v. 
STATE OF U.P. 
(Criminal Appeal No. 686 of 2010) 
MAY 28, 2014 
B 
[DR. B. S. CHAUHAN AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] 
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - s. 12 - Criminal contempt 
by a lawyer- Conviction under- Held: In view of the judgment 
passed in the connected appeal, order of conviction upheld, 
C 
however, imposition of fine of Rs. 20, 0001- on the appellant-
lawyer, reduced to Rs.2,0001- - Appellant to surrender to 
seNe out the sentence. 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal 
No. 686 of 2010. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 05.02.2010 of the 
. Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Contempt 
Application (Crl) No. 16 of 2009. 
Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Shikha Bani, Sameer Singh, 
Pahlad Singh Sharma for the Appellant. 
lrshad Ahmad, AAG, Abhisth Kumar, Archana Singh for 
D 
E 
the Respondent. 
F 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. In view of the judgment passed 
today in connected Criminal Appeal No. 555 of 2010, this 
appeal is dismissed. However, the fine of Rs.20,000/- imposed 
G 
on the appellant by the High Court by way of impugned 
judgment and order, is reduced to Rs.2,000/- and is directed 
to deposit the said fine forthwith. 
561 
H 
562 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2014] 6 S.C.R. 
A 
2. The appellant must surrender to serve out the sentence 
forthwith, failing which, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, 
Meerut, would secure his custody and send him to jail to serve 
out the sentence. A copy of the order be sent to the learned 
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, for information and 
B compliance. 
Nidhi Jain 
Appeal dismissed.