LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ALL INDIA INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: [1996] SUPP. 8 S.C.R. 295 · Decided: 03-10-1996 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.M. AHMADI · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

ALL INDIA INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK 
A 
SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED 
TRIBES EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS. 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 
OCTOBER 3 I, 1996. 
B 
[A.M. AHMADI, C.J. AND S.P. BHARUCHA, J.] 
Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 338 (8) and (5) 
National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes- C 
Powers of Civil Court-Exercise of-By Commission--Commission passed 
an interim order to the Bank to stop the promotion process pending fi1rther 
investigation and final verdict on certain complaints received by it-Held: 
Powers of Civil Court are exercisable by the Commission for the purposes 
of investigating any matter under Art. 338 (5)(a) or inquiry into any D 
complaint under Art. 338(5)(b) but not for the purposes of granting 
injunctions, temporary or permanent-Commission has no power to stay 
the promotion process pending inquiry into a complaint-Hence, 
Commission's interim order set aside--Constitution (Sixty Fifth Amendment) 
Act, 1990, Section 8--Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, Ss. 4 and 5-
Service Law. 
The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled 
Tribes directed respondent no. 3-Bank by an interim order to stop 
the promotion process pending further investigation and final verdict 
on certain complaints received by it. 
Respondent no.4, the Bank Officers' Association and respondent 
nos. 5 to 8 who were candidates for selection for promotion filed a 
writ petition before the High Court challenging the aforesaid order, 
which was allowed. Hence this appeal. 
On behalf of the appellant it was contended that the Commission 
had power to issue interim order under Article 338(5) and (8) of the 
Constitution of India introduced by the Constitution (Sixty Fifth 
Amendment) Act, 1990 and that the Commission enjoyed powers like 
a Civil Court for all purposes. 
295 
E 
F 
G 
H 
296 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1996] SUPP. 8 S.C.R. 
A 
Dismissing the appeal, this Court 
HELD : 1. All the procedural powers of a Civil Court given to 
the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 
by Article 338(8) of the Constitution of India are for the limited 
purpose of investigating any matter under Article 338(5)(b). The 
B powers of a Civil Court of granting injunctions, temporary or 
permanent, do not inhere in the Commission nor can such a power 
be inferred or derived from a reading of Clause 8 of Article 338 of the 
Constitution. [302-H, 303-A[ 
2. The Commission having not been specifically granted any 
C power to issue interim injunctions lacks the authority to issue an 
order directing respondent no.3-Bank to stop the promotion process 
pending further investigation and final verdict on the complaints 
received by it. [303-B, 297-E] 
D 
Ba/iram Waman Hiray v.Justice B. Lentin, [1988] 4 SCC 419, relied 
on. 
M V. Rajwade v. Dr. S.M Hassan, AIR (1954) Nag 71, referred to. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 13700 of 
E 1996. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 17.5.93 of the Delhi High Court 
in C.W.P. No. 1362 of 1993. 
F 
A.S. Nambiar, S.C. Paul, J.D. Jain, R.K. Azad and Santosh Singh 
for the Appellants. 
S.K. Bisaria for the Respondent No. 4 
G 
R. Mohan and Nedumaran for the Respondent No. 3 
Ms. Binu Tarnta for D.S. Mehra for the Respondent No. I 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by : 
H 
AHMADI, CJ. Leave granted. 
ALL INDIA INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK SIC AND srr EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSN_ y_ U.O I. !AHMADI. CJ I 2 9 7 
By a letter No. 9/D/SCTC/M(S)/93 dated March 4, 1993, the National A 
Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (hereafter referred 
to as 'the Commission') directed the Executive Director of the Indian 
Overseas Bank, the respondent No.3, thus: 
"No.9/D/SCTC/M(s)/93 
4th March, 1993 
Dear Shri K. Subramanian, 
Please refer to the commission letter No.9/D/SCTC/M(S)/92 
dated 18th Feb.93 in the matter of contravention of Government 
Directives relating reservation for SC/ST in Indian Overseas 
B 
Bank and Other matters adversely affecting their interests. 
C 
The commission had desired the reply of Bank within 7 days of 
said letter. It is a matter of concern that the reply from bank has 
not reached the commission till date. 
In view of the prima facie examination of the matter and D 
considering the fact that the Bank is reportedly going ahead 
with the promotion process, the commission, in exercise of the 
powers conferred upon it under section 8 of the Constitution 
(Sixty-Fifth Amendment) Act, 1990 hereby directs the Ba

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.