LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

ALI HOSSAIN MANDAL & ORS. versus WEST BENGAL BOARD OF PRIMARY EDUCATION & ORS.

Citation: [2024] 5 S.C.R. 935 · Decided: 09-05-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: HRISHIKESH ROY

cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

* Author
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 935 : 2024 INSC 453
Ali Hossain Mandal & Ors. 
v. 
West Bengal Board of Primary Education & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No. 1873 of 2024)
09 May 2024
[Hrishikesh Roy* and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the manner of shortlisting candidates for appointment to 
the posts of primary teacher as directed by the Division Bench was 
in departure from the procedure envisaged under Rule 8 of the 
West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2016; 
whether the remaining 3929 vacancies of primary school teachers 
were to be treated exclusively as part of 16,500 vacancies for 
which the recruitment process commenced via Notification dated 
23.12.2020, or whether such vacancies can be carried forward 
to the next recruitment cycle that commenced via Notification 
dated 29.09.2022 instead.
Headnotes†
West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 
2016 – rr.8, 12 – Procedure for selection of candidates – No 
vested right to be appointed against notified vacancies – 
Division Bench vide impugned judgment directed that 
appointments against the unfilled 3929 vacancies be made 
in a descending order of candidates’ respective inter-se 
positions in Teacher Eligibility Test List 2014 – Aforesaid 
3929 vacancies if to be treated exclusively as a part of the 
recruitment process initiated through Notification dated 
23.12.2020 and appointments against them if to be made 
from the already-expired panel or Merit List notified on 
15.02.2021:
Held: No – The selection process for appointment to the posts of 
primary teacher was to be made by assessment of merit by the 
Selection Committee as notified under Rule 8 of the Recruitment 
Rules, 2016 – The recruitment process initiated on 23.12.2020 
cannot continue indefinitely – The 2020 recruitment process 
had concluded and thereafter, the fresh recruitment process 
936
[2024] 5 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
commenced vide notification dated 29.09.2022 – The Panel or 
Merit List as notified on 15.02.2021 stood extinguished after expiry 
of one year on 15.02.2022, as per Rule 12 of the Recruitment 
Rules, 2016 as no extension was granted to the 15.02.2021 
Panel by any competent authority and therefore no relief can be 
granted to candidates who approached the court in May 2022, 
i.e., long after the panel stood extinguished – Not appropriate 
to direct appointments to be made against the remaining 3929 
vacancies, from the already-expired Merit List – A panel or a 
Merit List cannot be treated as if it exists in perpetuity, which will 
facilitate making appointments as and when required – When 
the panel expires or after the selection process is over with most 
posts being filled, the benefit of appointments cannot be given 
unless the panel’s validity is legally extended – However, no such 
extension of the panel’s validity was granted – In conclusion of 
the earlier process, a fresh recruitment process was undertaken 
vide Notification dated 29.09.2022 – Furthermore, even when 
vacancies are notified and an adequate number of candidates 
are shortlisted, these candidates do not acquire an indefeasible 
right to be appointed against those vacancies – Multiple factors 
are to be taken into account by the Board – For such reasons 
3929 vacancies remained unfilled by the time the panel’s 
validity expired – No further appointments permissible from 
the recruitment process initiated on 23.12.2020 when a fresh 
recruitment process had commenced – Impugned judgment of 
the Division Bench and the earlier direction given by the Single 
Judge, set aside. [Paras 25-27, 29, 30]
Case Law Cited
State of Orissa & Anr. v. Raj Kishore Nanda & Ors. [2010] 7 SCR 
301 : (2010) 6 SCC 777; Union of India v. B. Valluvan [2006] 
Supp. 7 SCR 755 : (2006) 8 SCC 686; Girdhar Kumar Dadhich 
v. State of Rajasthan [2009] 1 SCR 585 : (2009) 2 SCC 706; 
State of Bihar v. Mohd. Kalimuddin [1996] 1 SCR 314 : (1996) 
2 SCC 7 – relied on.
Dinesh Kumar Kashyap & Ors. v. South East Central Railway & 
Ors. [2018] 14 SCR 947 : (2019) 12 SCC 798 – distinguished. 
List of Acts
West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2016.
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 
937
Ali Hossain Mandal & Ors. v. West Bengal Board of 
Primary Education & Ors.
List of Keywords
Primary school teachers; Teacher Eligibility Test 2014; TET 1014; 
Remaining/balance/unfilled vacancies/left over vacancies; Cutoff 
marks; Panel or Merit List; Next recruitment cycle; Fresh recruitment 
cycle; Vacanc

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.