AKHIL BHARATIYA SOSHIT KARAMCHARI SANGH (RAILWAY) REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL SECRETARY ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
185 AKHJL BHARATIYA SOSHIT KARAMCHARI SANGH (RAIL- A WAY) REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL SECRETARY ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. November 14, 1980 [V. R. KRISHNA IYER, R. S. PATHAK AND 0. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.J Cvnstztution of India, 1950-Arts. 16, 46 and 335-Scope of-Reseri.·ation of posts under the St11te in favour of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribts- Car1y fonvard of unfilled posts for three years-validity of-- Jn so far as the initial recruitment and later promotion to classes II, III and IV are concerned, the Railway Administration provided for reservation of cer- tain percentage of vacancies for candidates belonging ito the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Since, despite the special provision the intake of these comrnunities into the Railway Services continued to be negligible further con- B c cessiom and relaxations were offered from time to time to members belonging D to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Even So, in ma.ny cases the vacancies reserved for them remained unfilled. Yet another step taken by 'he Railway Administrotion to lteep open the reserved vacancies was to adopt a policy of "carry forward" of, the unfilled reserved vacancies for at least three years. Jn obedience to the policy decisi0n of the Ministry of Home Affairs, the E Railway Board issued certain directives designed to protect and promote the interest of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled rfribes in the matter of their employment in the· Railway Administration. The policy directive· of reserving certain percentage of posts in favour of these communities having not proved effective, the Railway Board altered the rules "with a view to securing increased representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Rail\vay Services" (Annexure D). The Railway Board authorised the recruit- F ing bodies to slur over low places obtained by Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates except where it was fotlnd that the minimum standard ~necessary for the maintenance of efficiency 1 of the administration has not been ,- reached. The appointing authorities were directed to give additional training and coaching to the recruits so that they might come up to the standard of ot~1er recruits appointed alongwith them. Likewise where direct recruitment, otherwise than by examination, was provided for, the Railway Board directed G the selection of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates fulfilling a lower standard of suitability than from other communities, so Jong as the canc.Tidates had the prescribed minimum educational and technical qualifiootion111 and the appointing authorities were satisfied that the lowering of standard5 would not unduly affect the maintenance of efficiency of administmtion. ln the case of selection posts the Railway Board decided that promotions from class IV to class ID and from class Ill to class II were of the nature of H direct recruitment and the prescribed quota of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be provided as in direct recmitment. This reser- A. B c D E F G 186 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1981) 2 S.C.R. vation was confined to 'selection posts'. In regard to filling of "general posts" in class Ill it was stated that they were in the nature of direct recruitment and the reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as applicable ta din~...:t recruitment should be applied. (Annexure F). In 1969 the Railway Beard further revised their policy in regard to the rescr,,:arion and other concessions to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates in posts filled by promotion (Annexure H). The circular statt:d tbnt in promotion by selection from class III to class II, if a member of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was within the zone of eligibility the employee would be given one grading higher than the grading otherwise assign- able to him on the basis of his record of service. Jn April, 1970 the percentage of vacancies to be reserved for Scheduled ~-- Castes and Scheduled Tribes was raised from 12-!-% and 5% to 15% and 7to/o reipectively (Annexure I). By the same order the 11carry forward" rule \.Vas altered from 2 to 3 years. In 1973 the Railway Board issued a directive stating that the quota of 15% and 7!% for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes may be provided in pro- ri.1otion to the categories and posts in classes I
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex