LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

AJWAR versus WASEEM AND ANOTHER R1: WASEEM R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation: [2025] 7 S.C.R. 2062 · Decided: 29-07-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, SARASA VENKATANARAYANA BHATTI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 7 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 7 S.C.R. 2062 : 2025 INSC 968
Ajwar 
v. 
Waseem and Another 
R1: Waseem  
R2: State of Uttar Pradesh
(Criminal Appeal No. 3232 of 2025)
29 July 2025
[Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S.V.N. Bhatti, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the impugned order 
passed by the High Court granting bail to respondent no.1-accused.
Headnotes†
Bail – Cancellation of Bail – Supreme Court cancelled the 
bail of respondents-accused granted by the High Court and 
granted a window to move for bail afresh in event of any new 
circumstances emerging at a later stage – Earlier also the 
High Court had granted bail and in appeal thereagainst this 
Court had remanded back the matter – In terms with the order 
passed by the Supreme Court, the respondent no. 1 applied 
for bail afresh – Trial Court rejected the same, however, the 
High Court granted bail – Interference with:
Held: Scheme of the Constitution mandates that all Orders/
Judgments of this Court have to be given due deference to by all 
other Courts, including the High Courts, in letter and in spirit – Both 
the earlier Orders/Judgments cancelling bail to respondent no.1 
would leave no doubt that this Court examined all material aspects – 
Ultimately, this Court concluded that, in the circumstances, grant 
of bail was unjustified, both on facts and in law, while keeping a 
limited window open in futuro, which assumes significance yet was 
not properly appreciated by the High Court – Considerations which 
have weighed with the Single Judge while penning the impugned 
order are disturbing – Observations such as ‘one sided investigation 
by police’ and ‘ignoring the case of accused side’ besides being 
thoroughly unwarranted, had absolutely no nexus with the prayer 
for bail which the Single Judge was seized of – Given the heinous 
nature of the alleged offences, it was not open to the High Court 
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 
2063
Ajwar v. Waseem and Another
to make overcrowding in jails’ as a ground to allow bail – Further, 
the impugned order notes certain facts but does not really offer 
insight into the actual view of the High Court thereon or on the ‘new 
circumstances’ sought to be put forth by respondent no.1 – Moreover, 
the impugned order omitted to consider the detailed judgment passed 
by this Court to cull out whether ‘new circumstances’ had emerged 
to enlarge respondent no.1 on bail – Over-burdened docket is no 
justification for formulaic justice – High Court fell in error and has 
consequently offered up the impugned order for interdiction – When 
this Court had, while cancelling and/or setting aside bail granted on 
two previous occasions, examined all relevant aspects in extenso, 
it was incumbent upon the High Court to provide comprehensive 
reasoning, moreso, in light of this Court’s observation of future 
consideration of bail ‘at a later stage’ – Impugned order quashed – 
Bail granted to respondent no.1 set aside – Respondent no.1 to 
remain in custody and not be enlarged on bail till the conclusion 
of the trial – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.147, 148, 149, 352, 302, 307, 
504 and 34. [Paras 13, 16, 18, 20]
Case Law Cited
Ajwar v. Waseem (2024) 10 SCC 787; Manik Madhukar Sarve v. 
Vitthal Damuji Meher [2024] 8 SCR 753 : (2024) 10 SCC 753; 
Shabeen Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh [2025] 3 SCR 367 : 
(2025) 4 SCC 172; State of Rajasthan v. Indraj Singh, 2025 SCC 
OnLine SC 518; Victim ‘X’ v. State of Bihar, 2025 SCC OnLine 
SC 1490; Ajwar v. Niyaj Ahmad [2022] 7 SCR 356 : 2022 SCC 
OnLine SC 1403; Niranjan Singh v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote 
[1980] 3 SCR 15 : (1980) 2 SCC 559; Vilas Pandurang Pawar v. 
State of Maharashtra [2012] 8 SCR 270 : (2012) 8 SCC 795; 
Atulbhai Vithalbhai Bhanderi v. State of Gujarat [2023] 4 SCR 239 : 
(2023) 17 SCC 521; Manoj Kumar Khokhar v. State of Rajasthan 
(2022) 3 SCC 501; Ajwar v. Waseem [2024] 5 SCR 575 : (2024) 
10 SCC 768 – referred to.
Waseem v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2022 SCC OnLine All 1518; 
Waseem v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2022 SCC OnLine All  
1510 – referred to.
List of Acts
Penal Code, 1860; Constitution of India.
2064
[2025] 7 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Bail; Cancellation of Bail; New circumstances emerging at a later 
stage; Limited window open in futuro; One sided investigation by 
police; Ignoring the case of accused side; Over-burdened docket; 
Justification for formulaic justice’; Overcrowding in jails; At a later 
stage; Custody; Enlarged on bail; Conclusion of the trial; G

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.