LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

AJENDRA NATH versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation: [1964] 3 S.C.R. 289 · Decided: 23-04-1963 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. SUBBA RAO · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
280 
AJENDRA NATH 
v. 
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 
(K. SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAB DAYAL and 
J. R. MUDHOLKAR JJ.) 
Criminal Trial-Property reco~ered not protoed to be 1lole11 
properly-Acquittal by Se.sion8 Jwlge-State appeal agairwl 
few-Allowed agaimt the app£llant-Flnding 
01& Ile qw•on 
reverm1-High Court, if could record ita o .. n flnding1-AHi1· 
tanct in concealment of ·•lolen property-Scope of-1111.ian 
Penal Code (Act 46 of 1860), ss. 120-B, 379, 414. 
Five bales, containing woollen shawls and 
muft'lcra 
despatched from Kanpur by the British India Corporation Ltd. 
and another bale despatched from Haimanpur to Kanpur, 
were loaded in wagon at I tarsi rail way station. The leek of the 
wagon was found broken open and on checking at Nagpur the 
aforesaid bales were 
found mi•sing. On search, certain 
articles including some torn labels were recovered from the 
house of one Gopi Nath. The same day the appellant and 
few other persons were found by the Police, c0ming out of 
Gopi Nath's house whose front door was locked. They were 
taken to the Police Station and at the instance of the appellant, 
the police recovered woollen shawls, mufflers, bed 1heets and 
certain house-breaking implements from different place1 of that 
house. After investigation, six persons Including the appellant 
were put on trial before the Magistrate for several charge1 
under ss. 120•B, 379 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and 
except one Birendra Nath, all were convicted. On appeal, 
all the convicted persons were acquitted by the Additional 
Sessions Judge, on further appeal by the State, against the 
acqui:tal of Gopinath and the appellant, the High Court 
allowed the appeal only against the appellant with respect to 
the offence under s. 414 of the Indian Penal Code. On appeal 
by special leave, this Court held : 
H eU1 that the mere fact that the other accused per110D1 
were acquitted on the ground that the property recovered wao 
not proved to be stolen property did not preclude the State 
from appealing against the acquittal of the appellant against 
196S 
..f;ril 2J. 
196J 
.djmdra Nath 
v. 
Stattaf MadhJa 
· Puidtsh 
Raghubar DaJal. J, 
290 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1964] VOL. 
whom there Is better evidence. The State could challenge the 
correctness of 
the findings of the 
Additional 
Seuion• 
- Judge about the property being stolen property and the 
High Court could record its own 'findings on that question. 
Held further, that it Is not necessary for a person to be 
convicted under s. 414 Indian Penal Code that another person 
must be traced out and convict,d of an offence of committing 
theft. The prosecution ha1 simply to establish that the 
property recovered is stolen property and that the appellant 
provided help in its concealment and disposal; Th• circum· 
stances of the_ recovery in the present case sulficiently prove 
that the appellant had assisted in the concealment of the stolen 
property 
and had thus committed the offence under 1. 414 
Indian Penal Code. The appeal therefore, mll!t be dismi8'ed. 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal 
Appeal No. 226 of 1960. 
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and 
order dated July 28, 1960 of the Madhya Pra.desh 
High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 385 of 1959. 
A. R. Ohoubay and Naunit Lal, for the appe-
llant. 
I. N. Shroff, for the respondent. 
1963. April 23. The Judgment of the Court 
was delivered by 
RAGHUBAR DAYAL J.-This appeal, by special 
leave, is directed against the order of the High Court 
of Madhya Pradesh reversing, on State appeal, the 
order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshanga-
bad, acquiting the appellant, and convicting him 
of an offence under s. 414 l.P.C. 
Five bales, containing woolll'o shawls 2nd 
mufflers despatched from Kanpur by the British India 
Corporation Ltd., Kanpur Woollen Mills Branch, 
Kanpur, 
and 
another 
bale 
despatched from 
, 
3 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
291 
Haimanpur to Kanpur were loaded at !tarsi railway 
station on September !8, 1957, in Wagon No. C.R. 
325. The lock of the wagon was found broken open 
at Pandhurna Railway Mation at about 1.00 a.m. 
on September 20, 1957. 
Un checking at Nagpur 
the aforesaid bales were found missing. 
One of 
the bales despatched from Kanpur was found lying 
the next morning near the railway line between 
railway stations J aulkheda and Multai. 
On September 23, 1957, the house of one Gop! 
Nath, at Multai, was searched and certain articles, 
jncludin

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.