AJAYINDER SANGWAN AND ORS. versus BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A [2017] 7 S.C.R. 666 AJAYINDER SANGWAN AND ORS. v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI & ORS. (Transferred Case (Civil) No. 126 of2015) B AUGUST 23, 2017 (R.K. AGRAWAL AND ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, JJ.J c Advocates Act, 1961 - Fake lawyers and Bar Council elections -Bar Council took steps to cause an enquiry to.find out.fake lawyers and to hold the State Bar Councils elections only thereafter - Petitioners requesting for immediate elections of the State Bar Council as the term had expired long back whereas the Bar Council of India (BCJ) pressing for need of verification of the candidates to eliminate fake lawyers in order to bring improvement in the Bar and to get deserving practicing advocates for the respective Bar D Councils - Since the process of verification is not completed yet, last opportunity is given for the same - F(fteen days' time be given to cure the defective applications by the concerned Advocates and to all such advocates to submit their complete application.forms.for necessa1y verification of their degrees if they have not submitted E F the same earlier, from the date of publication of advertisement which shall be published within 7 days fi"om the passing of this order - One month time granted for verification of applications, without any charge, by the State Bar Councils, after the expilJ' of the above 15 days - The University Authorities shall ensure the verification of degrees awarded by them, without any charge, within one month on its presentation - The re.1pective State Bar Council~ยท shall publish a Final Electoral Roll by including the names and particulars of such advocates whose degrees attached with the application forms . have been verified by the concerned University cl11thorities - The names of all such advocates who have not removed the defects in G the application forms and also such persons whose degrees on ยท verification have been found false or fake by the University authorities shall not be included in the Electoral Rolls - BC/ to declare the schedule of elections thereajier - All the State Bar Councils are directed to take necessary steps and to conclude all H 666 AJAYlNDER SANGWAN AND ORS. v. BAR COUNCIL OF 667 DELHI & ORS. proceedings by 31.12.2017 and send a reply to the BCl - Thereafter, A the BCl, after receiving all the replies from the State Bar Councils, would file a status report - The BCl is directed to request a retired Judge of the Supreme Court in order to control and supervise the verification process and preparation of Electoral Rolls - The BCl is directed to take all steps in this regard immediatef-v in order to do B the needful - Matter to be listed in the second week of January, 2018 on a Non-Miscellaneous Day - Bar Council of lndia Certificate and Place of Practice (Verification) Rules, 2015. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Transfer Case (Civil) No. 126 of2015. Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. WITH T. C. (C) No. 110 of2015, W. P. (C) Nos. 97, 799, 644, 709, 776, 808 and 1005 of2016. K.K. Venugopal, AG., Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Rajiv Dutta, Y. P. Adhyaru, H.N. Nagamohan Das, Colin Gonsalves, Sushi! Kumar Jain, Sr. Ad vs., Ardhendurnauli Kumar Prasad, N irmal Kumar Ambastha, Ms. Taruna Arahendumauli Prasad, Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh; Nitesh Ranjan, Amritesh Raj, Rajesh Ranjan, Santosh Kumar, M.K. Maroria, Saudahini Sharma, Amit Sharma, Gunwant Dara, Ms. Somya Rathore, G.S. Makker, Ms. Anantha Narayana, Naveen Nagarjuna, Tanm Gulia, Gunjan Singh, Satya Mitra, Shreeji Bhavsar, Puneet Jain, Ms. Paya! Jain, Ms. Christi Jain, R. Balasubramian, Gaurav Sharma, Dhawal Mohan, Amandeep Kaur, Prateek Bhatia, Ms. Maitrayee Bane1jee, Kuna! Chatterji, P. Soma Sundaram, Mayilsamy K., K.P. Narayanan, Muthu . Ganesa Pandian, K. Kumaran, Mata Prasad Singh, Utkarsh Pandey, Ranjana Rastogi Singh, Parmanand Pandey, Mohinder J. S. Rupal, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Ms .. Bina Madhavan, Ms. Akanksha Mehra, Prateek Dhir, Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Mrs. Elizabath Antony (for Mis. Lawyer's Knit & Co.), M.A. Chinnasamy, Vishal Khattar, Ms. C. Rubavathi, S. Peer Mohammad, Sunil Kumar, V. Senthil Kumar, Y. Raja Gopala Rao, Venkateshwar Rao Anumolu, Prabhakar Parnam, Baldev Atreya, Deepak Goel, Pawan Kumar Shukla, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Kamal Kumar Pandey, Raj Singh Rana, Aditya Sharma, Akash Jindal, c D E F G H 668 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 7 S.C.R. A (for Mis. Parekh & Co.), Vikas Upadhyay, Sandeep Singh, B. Prabakaran, Ram S
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex