ABATI BEZBARUAH versus DIRECTOR GENERAL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA AND ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
ABATI BEZBARUAH
A
\'.
"
DY'. DIRECTOR GENERAL GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF
INDIA AND ANR.
<
FEBRUARY 14. 2003
B
[S.B . SINHA AND DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, JJ.]
...
{'
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Sections 166, 168 and 171:
'
Award of compensation-Quanlllm of compensation/Rate of Interest- c
Discretion of the Tribunal/Courts-Held, compensation should be just and
'
fair as to the facts and circumstances of the case-Guidelines/Formula as per
provision of law should be followed in computing compensation-Though
there exists no rule in awarding interest, it is solely on the discretion of the
'
Tribunal/High Courts-However, bank rate prevailing at the relevant time D
lt'ould normally be taken into consideration in awarding interest.
Husband of the claimant-appellant, \Vas riding a scooter which
•
collided with a jeep and he died. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded
A
certain amount of compensation of Rs. 2,50,200/- to the claimant and also
directed payment thereof with interest@ 6% per annum. On appeal, High E
~
Court enhanced the amount of compensation and also rate of interest.
Dissatisfied with the modified Award, the claimant preferred the present
appeal .
•
It was contended for the appellant that High Court erred in
awarding rate of interest on lower side than the prevailing rate of interest F
(
~
at the relevant time; and that quantum of compensation should be
enhanced by applying multiplier of 16 instead of 15 keeping into
consideration the age of the victim at the relevant time.
On behalf of the respondent, it was submitted that in the light of G
earlier decisions of the Supreme Court, multiplier of 10 should be
(
appropriate in calculating compensation and rate of interest @ 9% per
annum would be reasonable/fair in the facts and circumstances of the case.
,.
Partly allowing the appeal, the Court
1229
H
~
1230
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
f2003l I S.C.R.
A
HELD: (Per Sinha, J.) :
I. In the instant case, the victim at the relevant time was 40 years
of age. The Tribunal and the High Court cannot be said to have committed
an error in applying the multiplier of 15. Having regard to the prospects
and advancement of the future career of the deceased, a higher estimate
B of the yearly income of Rs. 45,000 would not be out of place. From the
said amount, one-third of the gross income towards personal living
expenses should be deducted. The amount so calculated viz. Rs. 30,000
should, thus be determined as the loss of dependency. The said sum should
then be capitalized by applying the multiplier of 15 which comes to Rs.
C 4,50,000. 11233-F, H; 1234-AI
2.1. Rate of interest on compensation/Award would depend upon the
facts and circumstances of each case. Award of interest would normally
)
depend upon the bank rate prevailing at the relevant time. The amount
of interest should, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,
D be paid at the rate of 9% per annum. 11232-H; 1233-A, q
·
Kaushnuma Begum (Smt.) and Ors. v. New India Assurance Co. ltd
and Ors., 120011 2 SCC 9 and United India Insurance Co. ltd v. Patricia
Jean Mahajan and Ors., 12002) 6 SCC 281, relied on.
E
R.l. Gupta and 0."s. v. Jupitor General Insurance Company and Ors.,
1199011 sec 356, referred to.
2.2. It is a well settled principle of law that the payment of
compensation on the basis of structured formula as provided for under
the Second Schedule should not ordinarily be deviated from. Furthermore,
F the amount of compensation should be just and fair in the facts and
circumstances of each case. 11233-EJ
Per Dr. Lakshmanan, J. (Supplementing):
1.1. The rate of interest must be just and reasonable depending upon
G the facts and circumstances of each case and taking all relevant factors
including inflation, change of economy, policy being adopted by the
Reserve Bank of ·India from time to time, how long the case is pending,
permanent injuries suffered by the victim, enormity of suffering, loss of
:'('.
future income, loss of enjoyment of life etc., into consideration. 11234-C-EI
H
1.2. No rate of interest is fixed under Section 171 of the Motor
L_
.t=
ABATI BEZRARUAH " DY IJIR. GEN GEO SURVEY OF !NOIA [S.B. SINHA.JI 1231
Vehicles Act. Varying rates of·interest are being awarded by Tribunals, A
High Courts and the Supreme Court. Interest can be granted enn if
claimant docs not specifically plCad for the same as ii is consequential in
ti•• eye of law. Interest is compensationExcerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex