A. VISWANATHAN versus STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PONDICHERRY & ANOTHER
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
โข A. VISWANATHAN A v. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, "of PONDICHERRY & ANOTHER ' FEBRUARY 6, 1987 B [E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, G.L. OZA AND M.M. DUTT, JJ.] ~ Motor Vehicles Act, 1939: Sections 46, 57, 62 & 47(1A)-lssue of temporary permits by R. T.A. repeatedly for a long number of years- Whether permissible-Temporary permits to be effective for limited -= y period of 4 months-Stage carriage permits-Reservation for Scheduled c Castes, Scheduled Tribes-Constitutionally valid. Respondent No. I-State Transport Appellate Tribunal set aside ยท-t a temporary permit to ply a stage carriage on the Pondicberry-Madras route issued under s.62 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 in favour of the appellant, and granted it in favour of respondent no. 2 for the remain- D ing period of the temporary permit. Hence this appeal by sptcial leave. The Court found that the period of temporary permit having come to an end, no further orders are necessary as regards the person who could operate a stage carriage under that permit. . ..I The Union Territory of Pondicherry, after the lapse of 7 years E from the date of the amendment of section 47 of the Act, issued rules on 12.6. 1985 regarding reservations to be made in favour of persons be- longing to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Section 47( IA) of the Act. Having regard to the slackness that is creeping into the manner in which the provisions of the Act regarding reservation of ' certain percentage of stage carriage permits to be made in favour of F persons belonging to Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes, and issue of temporary permits are being administered by some Transport Autho- rities, this Court, HELD: I.( I) Section 47 of the Act deals with the procedure to be followed by a Regional Transport Authority. In considering an applica- G lion for a stage carriage permit the Regional Transport Authority should have due regard to the following matters, namely: (a) the in- .~ terest of the public generally; (b) the advantage to the public of the service to be provided, including the saving of time likely to he effected thereby and any convenience arising from journeys not being broken; H (c) the adequacy of other passenger transport services operating or 179 A B c D E 180 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1987] 2 S.C.R. likely to operate in the near future, whether by road or other means, between the places to be served; (d) the benefit to any particular locality or localities likely to be afforded by the service; (e) the operation by the applicant of other transport services, including those in respect of which applications from him for permits are pending; and (I) the condi- tion of the roads includ,ed in the proposed route or area. It should also take into consideration any representations made by persons already providing passenger transport facilities by any means along or near the proposed route or area, or by any association representing persons interested in the provision of road transport facilities recongnised in this behalf by the State Government, or by any local authority or police authority within whose jurisdiction any part of the proposed route or area lies. Thus the paramount consideration that should govern the decision of a Regional Transport Authority in issuing a permit to run a stage carriage is the interest of the general publice. [183E-H; 184A-B] 1.(2) It was felt th"t the permits for plying stage carriages in India were being cornered by persons belonging to richer and more advanced classes in society, and persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other economically weaker sections of the com- munity were not able to compete with people who were rich and more advanced. Parliament th:erefore amended section 47 of the Act by intFo- ducing provisions for making reservation of certain percentage of stage carriage permits to persons belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and economically weaker sections of the community, viz Section 47( IA). The reservation made in favour of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is protected by clause(4) of Article 15 of the Constitu- tion oflndia. [184B-D; G] 1.(3) If stage carriage permits are to be issued then in compliance F with sub-section( lA) of Section 47 of the Act certain percentage of the said permits would have to be reserved for the persons belonging to Scheduled Castes, Sched10led Tribes and if the Government so d
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex