LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

A. MANJULA BHASHINI & OTHERS versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP. WOMENS COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER,

Citation: [2009] 10 S.C.R. 634 · Decided: 06-07-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.N. AGRAWAL · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2009] 10 S.C.R. 634 
A 
A. MANJULA BHASHINI & OTHERS 
v. 
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP. WOMEN'S 
COOPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. AND 
ANOTHER 
B 
(Civil Appeal No. 3702 of 2006) 
JULY 6, 2009 
[B.N. AGRAWAL AND G.S. SINGHVI, JJ.] 
c 
Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public 
Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern and Pay 
Structure) Act, 1994: 
Amending Act No.3 and 27 of 1998 - Constitutional 
validity of - Held : Not ultra vires the Constitution. 
". 
~-
D 
Sections 7, 7 A: 
Persons employed on daily wage basis or nominal 
muster roll or consolidated pay or as contingent worker on full 
E time basis in different departments of the Government of 
Andhra Pradesh and its agencies/instrumentalities -
Entitlement to be regularised in service on completion of five 
years - Helq : The policy of regularisation contained in first 
. 
... 
proviso to Section 7 of Act No.27of1998 is one time measure 
F - Intended to benefit only those daily wage employees, etc. 
who .completed 5 years continuous service on or before 
25.11.1993. The employees who completed 5 years service 
after 25. 11. 1993 cannot claim regularization - Declaration 
made by the Division Bench that the ban on regularisation 
G will be effective from 19.8.1998 i.e. the date on which Act 
No.27 of 1998 came into force and that all persons who have 
completed 5 years service as on that date would be entitled 
to be considered for regularisation of service is set aside -
The daily wage employees and others who are covered by 
H 
634 
.~ 
-,,,,. 
. 
_.., 
A MANJULA BHASHINI v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP. WOMEN'S 635 
COOPERATIVE FINANCE COPRN. LTD. 
Section 7 of the 1994 Act (amended) and whose services 
have not been regularised so far, shall be entitled to be 
considered for regularisation and their services shall be 
regularised subject to fulfillment of the conditions enumerated 
in G. 0. dated 22.4. 1994 -
The policy did not confer an 
indefensible right upon all daily wage employees to be 
regularized dehors the date of enforcement of the Act - Hence 
it cannot be said that the Legislature has taken away an 
accrued or vested right of the daily wage employees -
Insertion of Section 7 A does not amount to encroachment on 
the court's power of judicial review. 
Cut off date - Fixing of - Cut off date prescribed as the 
date of commencement of the main Act - Cannot be dubbed 
as arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational or discriminatory -
Constitution of India, Article 14. 
Constitution of India, 1950: 
Articles 245, 246 - Plenary powers conferred on 
Legislatures - Though Legislature cannot overrule, reverse 
or override a judicial decision, it can render a judicial decision 
ineffective by enacting a valid law fundamentally altering or 
1 changing the conditions on which such a decision is based -
Such law can also be given retrospective effect with a 
deeming date or with effect from a particular date. 
Legislative Intent - Ascertaining of - External aid -
Statement of objects and reasons can also be looked into as 
an external aid to appreciate the true intent/object sought to 
be achieved by enactment of the particular Act or for judging 
reasonableness of the classification made by such Act. 
Judicial Review: 
Section 7A of the amending Act 27 of 1998, amending 
the Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public 
Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern and Pay 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
636 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009] 10 S.C.R. 
A Structure) Act, 1994 - Does not amount to encroachment on 
the Court's power of judicial review. 
In the appeals, some of which have been filed by the 
State Government and its agencies/instrumentalities and 
some by the employees, who could not succeed before 
8 the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and/or the 
High Court to accept their prayer for issue of a mandamus 
to the concerned authorities to regularise their services, 
the questions which arose for consideration were: 
c 
D 
E 
(i) 
Whether the persons employed on daily wage 
basis or nominal muster roll or consolidated 
pay or as contingent worker on full time basis 
in different departments of the Government of 
Andhra 
Pradesh 
and 
its 
agencies/ 
instrumentalities are entitled to be regularised 
in service on completion of 5 years; and 
(ii) 
whether amendments made in the Andhra 
Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to 
Public Services and Rationalization of Staff 
Pattern and Pay Structure) Act, 1994 by 
Amendment Act Nos.3 and 27 of

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.